O
Town of Riverhead
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

Duffy MX Motocross Track scoping

Town of Riverhead

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (6)Neutral (2)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 18, 2026.

Public comments (12)

OpposedLaura Jens SmithFeb 18, 2026

Detailed a long list of issues the DEIS must address: truck trips, prime agricultural soils, Pine Barrens open space, groundwater/PFOS plume, noise modeling, traffic, wetlands, lighting and community character.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 12:47 →
SupportiveVictor PrusinowskiFeb 18, 2026

The applicant's consultant said all alternatives will be studied, agreed to consider a restoration bond, and argued the excavation is noise mitigation, not a sand mine.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 30:00 →
OpposedBarbara BlassFeb 18, 2026

Criticized sending a prohibited use to the ZBA, questioned the $360,000 sand revenue temptation, and urged the scope to address WSRR recreation designation, groundwater depth and special permit criteria.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 34:21 →
SupportiveDan DuffyFeb 18, 2026

The applicant argued an indoor track is not viable for the sport, below-grade construction is the best noise mitigation, and no agricultural topsoil would be removed.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 43:13 →
SupportiveDan Duffy Jr.Feb 18, 2026

Called the excavation a 6-to-12-foot grade adjustment rather than a mine, and said the finished track would be greener than the current field.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 43:13 →
OpposedCraig DalgrenFeb 18, 2026

Nearby resident raised dust, water supply for dust suppression, lighting, wildlife, special events, cumulative noise from multiple bikes, and quality-of-life concerns.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 52:02 →
OpposedTaku TurchinFeb 18, 2026

Greater Calverton Civic Association president called the draft scope fundamentally inadequate, demanding property value analysis, rigorous noise testing, and independent review; a letter will follow.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 49:03 →
OpposedMike SpindlerFeb 18, 2026

45-year River Road resident urged the board to study the scope thoroughly, saying the project would shatter the area's peace and tranquility.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 58:40 →
OpposedTrisha YakaboskiFeb 18, 2026

A licensed daycare provider 1,000 feet from the site described risks to children in her care from noise, dust and safety, and said the track belongs in Enterprise Park instead.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:05:04 →
SupportiveEd BrockmanFeb 18, 2026

Asked that the project get equal consideration given existing noise sources in Calverton like the airport and raceway.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 42:13 →
NeutralBrett MauricioFeb 18, 2026

Suggested modern four-stroke bikes and stock exhaust requirements could address much of the noise concern.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 45:28 →
NeutralCarrie ReyesFeb 18, 2026

A Calverton resident who noted the industry's shift toward electric bikes and deferred substantive comments to the later public hearing.

Town Board - Feb 18, 2026 · 56:02 →