O
Town of Riverhead
← Community
Taxes BudgetCommunity discussion

Brother Bear Canna greenhouse

Town of Riverhead

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (16)Concerned (3)

At a glance

Public comments
19
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 18, 2026.

Public comments (19)

OpposedHelen ReynoldsJun 18, 2026

Asked the board to make the applicant address the possibility of cannabis odor reaching neighbors, which she said went unaddressed.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:26:03 →
OpposedLinda NemathJun 18, 2026

A Calverton resident raised groundwater worries — the nearby landfill's buried toxins, a denied irrigation well for Windcrest, and unlimited water use for the greenhouse during droughts.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:13:38 →
OpposedCarrie McKillopJun 18, 2026

Read the APZ zoning intent — preserving farmland, vistas and agrotourism — and argued none of it applies, noting she found no evidence the parcel was ever farmed.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:16:16 →
OpposedKevin DonneyouJun 18, 2026

Said hundreds of residents in Windcrest East and Foxwood Village will be affected by noise, light and odor pollution and falling property values.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:18:10 →
OpposedTucky ChurchJun 18, 2026

The Greater Calverton Civic Association president thanked the board for its questions, said opposition is large and growing weekly, and suggested the applicant look for another site.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:19:03 →
OpposedLinda NemathJun 18, 2026

Returned to argue the applicant would seek agricultural tax relief, paying less than any nearby home while the town claims it wants to build the tax base.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:20:23 →
OpposedAl BraunJun 18, 2026

A 23-year Northwoods Road resident said this isn't what he signed up for and called it insane that an $8-million-a-year business would shortchange the town on taxes while he pays $14,000 a year.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:21:13 →
OpposedRalph ColbyJun 18, 2026

Argued that if 80 percent of the equipment is industrial — ordered from industrial suppliers at up to 26 tons — the operation should be called industry, not a farm.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:23:01 →
OpposedGeorge AltlanoJun 18, 2026

Worried about truck backup alarms audible a quarter mile away as deliveries come in and out.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:24:55 →
OpposedGeorge PammerJun 18, 2026

A Windcrest-area neighbor laid out state cannabis security rules — vaults, 72 cameras, 8-foot security fencing — arguing the project is an industrial facility, not a farm, and that the applicant misrepresented the fence's purpose at the ZBA.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:06:03 →
OpposedSteve HaberJun 18, 2026

A nearby resident invited board members to his home to hear existing road noise himself, questioned whether the sound study accounted for foliage and seasons, and noted no farm runs 24/7 with turbine fans.

Planning Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 1:11:45 →
OpposedLinda NemithMay 21, 2026

Calverton resident worried about 24-28 industrial air conditioning units and a possible diesel generator replacing the quiet of a farming community.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:03:25 →
OpposedBarbara RippleMay 21, 2026

Said far more residents will be harmed than profit, and demanded guarantees her home value and utility bills won't suffer; called the project damaging to the neighborhood.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:04:44 →
ConcernedToffee TurchinMay 21, 2026

Calverton Civic Association president questioned the sound study, noting the measured Maryland facility was a repurposed industrial building, and asked for more measurements at the public hearing.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:07:09 →
ConcernedCarrie McKillahMay 21, 2026

Pressed on whether the cannabis licensee is valid and listed with the Office of Cannabis Management; staff said licensing isn't the board's job.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:08:05 →
OpposedKevin DonnayuMay 21, 2026

A retired attorney said hundreds of neighbors oppose the project, citing expected odor and diminished property values, and questioned why a vacant site away from homes wasn't chosen.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:15:48 →
OpposedCarmine AnnabelleMay 21, 2026

Longtime opponent from Wincrest East said filtration promises slid from 100% to 60%, called the noise study apples-to-oranges, and demanded real specifications before anything is approved.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:17:30 →
OpposedUnidentified Resident (Churchill)May 21, 2026

Echoed concerns that land values and town revenue would suffer, and argued an agricultural tax exemption on a $20 million operation would shift costs to every Riverhead taxpayer.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:26:06 →
ConcernedUnidentified ResidentMay 21, 2026

Asked whether the developer ever delivered the comparative reports Chairman Densieski requested from similar facilities, saying the Maryland site studied isn't an identical system.

Planning Board - May 21, 2026 · 1:01:02 →