O
Town of Riverhead
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

111 East Main St Eminent Domain

Town of Riverhead

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (6)Concerned (7)

At a glance

Public comments
17
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 20, 2026.

Public comments (17)

OpposedCindy CliffordMay 20, 2026

Called the town's presentation 'erroneous and exaggerated,' defended property rights, and argued the Science Center would be a better downtown magnet than a hotel.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 35:36 →
OpposedLaura Jens-SmithMay 20, 2026

Argued the eminent domain process is premature and incomplete, and questioned whether alternative private development deals are being hidden from the public.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 38:38 →
SupportiveMike DuboisMay 20, 2026

Read a letter from teacher Garrett Moore supporting the Science Center as an educational and career opportunity for local students.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 51:50 →
ConcernedTaque TurchinMay 20, 2026

Said the hearing is incomplete — the town hasn't said what it actually plans to put on the site.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 58:05 →
ConcernedAngela DeVitoMay 20, 2026

Asked whether the West Marine building next door is next on the eminent domain list.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 59:42 →
OpposedRon HarariMay 20, 2026

Argued eminent domain shouldn't benefit a private hotel project and warned of huge taxpayer costs, citing the Gyrodyne case.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 1:02:33 →
ConcernedJoan CearMay 20, 2026

Questioned who pays for the acquisition and pressed for a specific, legally sufficient public purpose for the parcel.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 1:06:00 →
SupportiveAngela YunoldMay 20, 2026

FRANCA president voiced strong support for the Science Center and suggested the town partner with or fund it instead of taking the property.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 1:18:58 →
OpposedJimmy CarasanoMay 20, 2026

The unpaid contractor described the mechanic's lien and said the Science Center still owes him roughly $20,000.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 1:34:03 →
ConcernedColin TookerMay 20, 2026

Pressed the board on cost — pointing out there's no appraisal yet — and asked whether any officials have talked to the developer about the site.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 1:40:50 →
OpposedJohn McAuliffMay 20, 2026

Warned of a serious legal fight if the town proceeds and argued the town should work with the existing Science Center rather than an undefined alternative.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 1:53:31 →
ConcernedClaudette BiancoMay 20, 2026

Focused on taxpayer costs, noting the town has busted the tax cap for years and residents can't afford more spending.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 2:00:06 →
SupportiveKevin SheaMay 20, 2026

Delivered a poem arguing for the Science Center, citing $3.5 million in committed grants and a $884,000 Jump Start grant expiring June 30.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 2:05:19 →
SupportivePeter TimmonsMay 20, 2026

Strongly backed the condemnation, calling the building a vacant blight and saying repeated Science Center promises have produced nothing.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 2:10:51 →
ConcernedMerrideth McDonaldMay 20, 2026

Asked whether the town could negotiate a fair purchase or land swap with the Science Center instead of condemning it.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 2:25:04 →
OpposedDesmond WongMay 20, 2026

Argued the real issue is that every downtown problem keeps getting solved with the same beneficiary, and demanded financial disclosures and recusals.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 2:27:17 →
ConcernedAllyson MatwayMay 20, 2026

On Zoom, asked how the condemnation would be paid for and questioned whether an 'activation site' can really guarantee downtown revival.

Town Board - May 20, 2026 · 2:36:31 →